|
MURRAY’S EXPEDITION TO PERIM IN 1799
The invasion of Egypt by Napoleon posed a very real
threat to India. In April 1798 Napoleon in a letter had
written “...the truth is that the expedition to the
East will oblige the enemy to send six additional ships
of war to India and perhaps twice as many frigates to
the mouth of the Red Sea.” This letter was
intercepted by the British but Napoleon had
overestimated the British response. Lord Dundass, the
War Minister, had finally decided on 13 June 1798 that
Napoleon’s immediate objective was Egypt and that from
there he would probably advance overland to India to
give support to Tipoo Sultan and others. Orders were
passed to Bombay and towards the end of September Rear
Admiral Rainier, C-in-C East Indies, was ordered to be
ready to send as large a squadron as possible to the Red
Sea. Rainier had few ships so Cape Town was asked to
send any reinforcements they could spare. These amounted
to three ships under Commodore Blankett, the Leopard
(50), the Daedalus (32) and the Orestes
(18).
Nelson then defeated the French fleet in the Battle of
the Nile on 2 August 1798 and although it was then much
less likely that the French would be able to move on
India, Napoleon remained a threat in Egypt. No chances
were being taken. It was still thought possible that the
French might have forces sufficient to take and hold
Perim, thus blocking the Straits of Bab el Mandeb. (East
India House was well aware that the strait between
Africa and Perim was 14 to 15 miles wide, but it was
little used by ships on account of the numerous rocks
and shoals towards the African shore. There was a
mistakenly-held view that it was necessary for ships to
steer close to the western point of Perim or through the
narrow strait between Perim and the Arabian shore.)
At the end of November 1798 Rear Admiral Rainier was
sent a letter ordering him, based on intelligence he had
at the time, to send sufficient ships of his squadron,
together with a military expedition, to take possession
of Perim and then hold it against all-comers. Whilst the
military force for Perim was being got ready Rainier
sent some ships on ahead. Two of these, Centurion
(50) and Albatross (18), appeared before Suez on
27 April 1799 and chased two French gunboats into the
harbour.
The force assembled for Perim was the 1799 equivalent of
a present day all-arms battlegroup. The largest element
was the infantry, from the 84th Regiment, and
this amounted to only the equivalent of one full
strength rifle company plus a robust detachment from
Headquarters Company. The Commanding Officer of the 84th,
Lieutenant Colonel Murray, was the expedition commander.
From his Regiment there were six other officers, one
captain and five lieutenants, plus 10 NCOs. Artillery
consisted of one Indian battery of two Indian officers,
10 Indian NCOs, 10 British and 70 Indian gunners, or
matrasses as the latter were called, plus two drummers
(of which the 84th also had five.) There was
also a weak company of Marines. An Engineer detachment
completed the military part of the expedition. This
comprised three officers and 33 men with specialist
trades, including 10 bricklayers and 10 carpenters.
Altogether the military element totalled only about 350
men out of the 1066 souls who set sail. The remainder
were ‘followers’. These can be divided into two groups:
civilian workers of some kind and families. Perhaps
somewhat surprisingly, for some detachments this was an
‘accompanied tour’. The 84th were
unaccompanied, as were the Engineers. But the Artillery
had 37 wives and 20 children with them and the Marines
20 wives and five children. But the biggest group of
families was accompanying the crews of the transports
that were ‘under command’. These totalled 174 men but
with them they had 120 wives and 55 children. Another
group of ‘workers’ was the Indian 100 labourers taken on
by the Engineers to assist the specialist tradesmen. The
final group of followers was the Indian 125 men
servants, over half of whom were with the 84th.
An important small group was providing medical support:
one assistant surgeon and five hospital assistants, the
latter listed as followers of the 84th.
Meanwhile Blankett’s squadron had been sailing up the
East Coast of Africa. These ships arrived at Madagascar
on 5 October and off the Comores Islands on 5 November.
The squadron was making very slow progress due to the
lack of suitable winds and supplies had run short, so
Daedalus was ordered to return to the Cape while the
other two ships continued on to Aden, arriving there on
11 April 1799. There they met up with Fox (32)
which had been escorting the troop transports from
Bombay. These were carrying the troops for two
expeditions, one going to Mocha and the other to Perim.
Blankett’s two ships escorted the expedition to Mocha,
whilst the Fox went with the expedition going to
Perim. This consisted of the East India Company’s
cruiser Strombolo (being used as a transport) and
two hired transports the Upton Castle and the
Jehangeer. Lieutenant Colonel Murray was a
Detachment Commander in his own right, reporting
directly back to the Governor of Bombay.
Murray landed on Perim on 3 May 1799, the day before
Tipoo Sultan was killed and his army defeated at the
battle of Seringapatan. Murray wrote his first despatch
to Bombay on the 7th, to be taken back to India in the
frigate Antelope which had just arrived from
Mocha. There were two major disappointments: the first
was that Perim was barren and that prospects of finding
water were slim. The second was that no batteries
erected on the island could command the entrance to the
Red Sea; in spite of this aim not being achievable he
thought the harbour could be of the greatest importance
to the Navy. However, in the absence of a naval
squadron, he would need troop reinforcements to hold the
island, which was larger than he had expected. He
requested a further 150-200 European troops and 250-300
sepoys. In effect he asked for the military element of
his force to be doubled.
He had sent an officer on a reconnaissance to the
Arabian shore and preliminary reports suggested that he
could procure all necessary supplies and water from
there. He included in his despatch a request for
provisions and for additional water casks and a wide
range of building materials and tools. Unfortunately
Surgeon Day had died during the voyage from India and
Murray requested a replacement, the Navy providing
medical cover in the meantime.
Murray added a p.s. to his despatch that Commodore
Blankett’s squadron was now working into the harbour.
Whilst Blankett was entering he recalled the Antelope
by signal so that he could send his own despatch to
Bombay. This also allowed Murray to add to his first
despatch of 7 May. One of Murray’s problems was that his
two civilian transports were on a fairly short charter
and he might not be able to release them in time.
Much of the content of the exchange of letters between
Blankett and Murray was to do with water. A letter from
Blankett to Murray, written on board the Leopard
in Perim harbour on 21 May, was an example of continuing
poor relations between the two officers. Blankett wrote
that as the Bombay Presidency had not done him the
honour even of notifying him of Murray’s arrival, he
must naturally be allowed to be ignorant of the motives
that had led that Presidency to take possession of the
Island of Perim!
In his report to Bombay Murray had mentioned the problem
of his two civilian transports being on a fairly short
charter. Early in June he decided to send the Upton
Castle back to Bombay to get her there before her
charter ran out. Murray took this opportunity of weeding
out non-essential personnel from Perim, sending a total
of 263 men, women and children back to Bombay.
In August, Blankett, now a Rear Admiral, replied to a
further request from Murray for him to send one of his
ships from Mocha with all available water casks in the
period 6-8 September, by which time the tank being
constructed on the island should have been completed.
The aim was to bring in a six-month supply of water
before that part of the monsoon set in that would have
prevented resupply from Mocha. Blankett said he could
not spare a ship for this task as the only two ships he
had with him were the Leopard and the
Centurion. Blankett pointed out that Murray had
three ships with him, plus several country craft which
he should use to arrange for water supply.
On 7 September, having received this negative response
and with only 45 days worth of water remaining and not
knowing from where or when the next resupply could be
obtained, Murray decided to withdraw the majority of his
force to Aden where the Sultan was very happy to receive
him and his force. On 21 September Murray himself
returned to Perim selecting to leave behind mostly
European troops in Aden as they were the better
disciplined. On 30 November Murray (on Perim) wrote to
his subordinate commanders (who were in Aden) asking
them to give their opinion as to the feasibility of ever
commanding the straits with artillery sited on Perim.
His engineer replied that it was impossible, having even
considered the practicability of building a fort on the
end of a pier at least a mile out into the Small Strait!
It needed to be a mile to be able to cover the navigable
channel with 32 pounders, which had a range of about a
mile. His artillery commander was emphatic that no
batteries could be established on any part of the island
that would in any degree command the Red Sea.
|
He then went on to specify the artillery
required to man the redoubts and battery
positions that would be needed to be built on
the commanding points for the defence of the
island: Two companies of artillery and four
companies of gun lascars would be needed to man
a total of sixteen 32 pounders, eight 12
pounders and two 8 inch howitzers. |

This photograph, taken in
August 2007, is of a 32 pounder on a redoubt at
the Citadel at Plymouth. |
It will be recalled that it had been thought unsafe for
a ship to be sailed towards the African side of the main
strait. Early in December the captain of the
Strombolo found a good route near the African coast.
There was now no valid reason for Murray to remain on
Perim.
On 26 February 1800 a letter was sent from Bombay to
Murray at Aden approving his conduct and his decision to
withdraw part of his force to Aden. Bombay at the same
time made it quite clear that troops could not remain
there permanently, in spite of the Sultan having offered
this facility, which Murray was to decline as tactfully
as possible. Murray was to withdraw his detachment back
to Bombay ‘with all practicable expedition’. Murray was
not able to confirm receipt of his new orders until 10
April, expressing also his relief that his actions had
met with approval. No date has been found for the
eventual withdrawal from Perim of the last of Murray’s
troops, but the expedition was back in India by the end
of June, Murray himself having remained in Mocha as
Political Agent.
On now to 1876, when Lieutenant King was
OC Outpost Perim.
During his second tour of two months there he explored
the island and wrote a comprehensive booklet about
Perim. This is what he wrote about Murray’s expedition
of 1799:
Numerous traces of Murray’s occupation still exist at
the head of Murray’s Bay, a long narrow bay of which the
spit forms the South West boundary. Here may be seen the
remains of well-built walls about two feet thick and
formed of stones broken into shape with a hammer and
neatly fitted together without any mortar. Nothing but
the bare walls remain now. Still, one can easily
discover which were the barracks for European troops and
which for natives. Other scattered ruins on some
slightly elevated ground at a short distance appear to
have been officers’ quarters, cookhouses and stores,
etc. There is also a ruined circular tank, 500 yards
from the beach, intended to hold 25,000 gallons. It is
well built and has been lined with some hard cement. I
have been told by the natives that there was formerly in
the wall of this tank a large stone with an inscription
on it but some other officer or other took it away with
him. In the corner of the large plain nearest to
Murray’s Camp and separated from it by a low range of
hills is a row of 10 or 11 graves, close beside one
another. The centre grave, which appears to have been
formerly plastered over with mortar, I conjecture to be
that of a lieutenant of the 84th Regiment.
A naval chart of 1886 shows the ruins of the two
barracks referred to by King. They were about 150-200
yards from the shore on the southern edge of Murray Bay.
Their location is marked on the photograph from Google
Earth. In 1888 the Coal Company was tasked by the
Residency in Aden to produce an inventory of all
buildings and structures on their concession. Of
particular relevance was ‘Building No.80’, a freshwater
tank built at the head of Murray Bay. The plan shows a
circular tank, 15ft 2ins in diameter at the bottom and
25ft 3ins in diameter at the top. The tank was 14ft deep
and stepped up from the bottom with steps 4, 4, 2, 1, 1
and 2ft in height, each step forming a ring 2ft wide.
This was the tank described by King in his 1877 booklet,
but as yet it has not been identified on Google Earth.
There was also a water catchment system consisting of a
wall built of stone and mortar for a length of 286ft,
2ft thick and 2ft high.

Winding the clock on to 1964, one of the many
fascinating things about the Perim of that year was the
presence there of the barrels of two quite large
breech-loading cannon. One had a date of manufacture of
1798 and the other 1799. The latter date especially cuts
things a bit fine for them to have been put on Perim
during Murray’s occupation.

The National Maritime Museum was contacted for further
information about the marks on the two cannon. The
earlier of the two had the mark WG 32-2-17 and the other
WG 34-3-3. The Museum stated that the numerals referred
to their weights in hundredweights, quarters and pounds
and that from the tables of dimensions for various
calibres of muzzle-loaders the cannon were both
12-pounders. WG was the maker’s name, Wiggins and
Graham. If the cannon were not on Perim in 1800 they
must have been put there subsequent to the 1857
reoccupation, but this seems unlikely although
muzzle-loaded cannon were still in use in the British
Army at this date. |